Skip to main content

About Us

Beyond Reasonable Doubt
Uncovering the Truth. Challenging the Narrative. Establishing the Facts.

Welcome to Beyond Reasonable Doubt Investigations (BRD), an independent UK-based investigative news platform dedicated to digging deeper than the headlines. In an era of 24-hour news cycles and recycled press releases, we exist to do the work that others won't: meticulous, evidence-based research into the stories that matter.

We believe that the official version of events is rarely the whole story. Whether it is a miscarriage of justice in our courts, systemic failure in our hospitals, or corruption in our public institutions, our mission is to shine a light on the facts until the truth is established—beyond reasonable doubt.

Our Mission

Our name is our promise. In a legal system, "beyond reasonable doubt" is the high standard required to deprive a person of their liberty. We believe journalism should be held to a similarly high standard.

Exposing Systemic Failure

Investigating how institutions like the NHS, the Home Office, and the Criminal Justice System fail the very people they are meant to protect.

Challenging Wrongful Convictions

Examining cases where the evidence does not add up, and where innocent individuals may have been scapegoated to protect institutional reputations.

Giving a Voice to the Silenced

Providing a platform for whistleblowers, victims, and experts who have been ignored or silenced by the mainstream narrative.

Why We Investigate

You might ask: Why start this investigation now?

The answer is simple: Because the system is breaking, and trust is eroding.

We live in a time where "administrative evil"—the bureaucratic destruction of lives to protect reputations—is becoming commonplace. From the Post Office Horizon scandal to the Infected Blood inquiry, and the disturbing questions surrounding recent NHS convictions, we have seen time and again that institutions will prioritize their own survival over the truth.

We investigate because we believe the public deserves better. We investigate because when a nurse is wrongly convicted, or a patient dies due to negligence, or a whistleblower is bankrupted for speaking out, it is not just a tragedy for them—it is a threat to us all.

Our Methodology

We do not deal in rumors or conspiracy theories. Our work is grounded in forensic research and hard data.

  • Document-Based Research: We scour court transcripts, official reports, Freedom of Information (FOI) releases, and scientific data to build our cases.
  • Expert Analysis: We consult with medical, legal, and statistical experts to ensure our reporting is accurate and cuts through the jargon.
  • Independence: We are completely independent. We have no shareholders to please and no political party to serve. Our only loyalty is to the facts.

Join the Investigation

True investigative journalism is a collaborative effort. We rely on the courage of insiders and the vigilance of the public. If you have information, documents, or a tip about a story we should be looking into, we want to hear from you.

[email protected]

All communications are treated with strict confidence.

Popular posts from this blog

Thumbnail

How the Thirlwall Inquiry Accidentally Exonerated Lucy Letby

THE THIRLWALL PAPERS: A Special Investigative Journal ​ Institutional Failure, Clinical Negligence, and the Question of Miscarriage of Justice at the Countess of Chester Hospital ​EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Scapegoat Hypothesis The Thirlwall Inquiry was established to determine how a "serial killer" was allowed to operate unchecked in a British neonatal unit. However, a forensic examination of thousands of pages of transcripts, internal emails, and expert reports reveals a different reality. Instead of confirming the guilt of Lucy Letby, the Inquiry has exposed a hospital in a state of "chronic" operational collapse, flooding with raw sewage, and a specific group of consultants who, unable to explain deaths caused by their own clinical limitations, resorted to speculative theories to shift the blame. This journal combines findings from independent investigative reports and exclusive evidence to present a unified timeline of failure. It posits that Luc...
Thumbnail

Lucy Letby Innocent? New Evidence Suggests Greatest UK Miscarriage of Justice

​It was the trial that gripped the nation. Lucy Letby , a quiet, beige-wearing neonatal nurse from Hereford , was branded the most prolific child serial killer in modern British history. Handed 15 whole-life orders, she was locked away, ostensibly the monster who stalked the wards of the Countess of Chester Hospital . But tonight, a darker, far more disturbing truth is emerging: Lucy Letby may be completely innocent. A bombshell investigation involving world-leading medical experts, leaked documents, and suppressed evidence suggests that the "Angel of Death" narrative was a fiction constructed to cover up a failing hospital's catastrophic incompetence. From consultants who allegedly lied in court to police officers blinded by confirmation bias , the system didn't just fail Lucy Letby—it actively manufactured a killer where there was none. ​Here is the shocking, detailed case for her innocence that the jury never fully heard. ​EXCLUSIVE: The ...
Thumbnail

The Commercialisation of Guilt: Did Judith Moritz and the BBC "Sell" the Lucy Letby Verdict?

In the history of British miscarriages of justice Miscarriage of Justice: A failure of a court or judicial system to attain the ends of justice, typically resulting in the conviction of an innocent person. Notable UK examples include the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four. , the role of the media has often been to ask the difficult questions that the courts ignored. In the case of R v Letby , however, the media did not just report the prosecution’s case—they monetised it. At the heart of this "guilt industry" stands Judith Moritz, the BBC’s North of England Correspondent. While the public trusted the BBC for impartial reporting, a forensic examination of Moritz's conduct reveals a disturbing alignment of professional duty and private profit. Our investigation suggests that the "unmasking" of Lucy Letby was less a journalistic endeavour and more a commercial product, built on a narrative of monstrosity that was too lucrative to fact-check. ...