Skip to main content

Justice for Lucy Letby: The Anthem for a Miscarriage of Justice | BRD Investigations

Official cover art for Justice for Lucy Letby song by Beyond Reasonable Doubt - Campaign for innocence and fresh appeal

Released by Beyond Reasonable Doubt Investigations | Relaunched: December 2025

In August 2025, we released a song that was more than just music; it was a desperate plea for truth. "Justice for Lucy Letby" was created to cut through the noise of the mainstream media and deliver the facts of the case directly to the public.

Today, we are relaunching this campaign anthem. Why? Because the cracks in the prosecution's case are no longer hairline fractures—they are gaping holes. With new experts coming forward, statistical evidence being debunked, and the "air embolism" theory falling apart under scrutiny, this song is more relevant now than the day it was written.

We need you to listen, we need you to share, and we need you to help us #FreeLucy.

Watch the Official Video

Why We Wrote This Song: Breaking Down the Flaws

We created this track at BRD Investigations because the complexity of the trial often stops people from seeing the truth. The song breaks down the specific areas where Lucy was failed by the justice system.

1. The "Air Embolism" Theory

The prosecution relied heavily on the theory that Lucy injected air into infants. However, as the song lyrics highlight, leading experts—including the specific work of Professor Shu Lee—suggest that the prosecution's experts fundamentally misunderstood the science. What was presented as murder is far more likely to have been natural causes or issues with medical equipment, such as dislodged breathing tubes.

2. The Contradictory Testimony (Dr Ravi Jayaram)

One of the most chilling verses in our song details the testimony of Dr Ravi Jayaram. In court, he described catching Lucy "doing nothing" while a baby desaturated. However, crucial email evidence suggests it was Lucy who called for assistance. This contradiction suggests that the narrative presented to the jury was constructed after the fact, yet this discrepancy was not enough to halt the trial.

3. The Insulin Evidence

Perhaps the most "scientific" looking evidence was the insulin levels. Yet, as we sing, these tests were "not made for forensic use." The immunoassay tests used are known to produce false positives and cannot distinguish between synthetic and natural insulin without a confirmatory test—a test that was never performed. A life sentence was handed down based on a screening test that the manufacturer explicitly states should not be used as definitive proof.

4. The "Confession" Notes

The media latched onto Lucy's scrawled notes ("I am evil") as a confession. We know these were the ramblings of a traumatised nurse, advised by therapy to write down her feelings of guilt and inadequacy—not guilt for murder, but the guilt of not being able to save the babies in her care. The song reclaims these notes for what they are: a cry for help, not an admission of a crime.

Full Lyrics: "Justice for Lucy Letby"

Read the words closely. This is the story of a miscarriage of justice.

They built a case on numbers, a chart to make a stand, A witch hunt needed a scapegoat, a scapegoat for the land. They chose a timeframe neatly, to fit a wicked plan, Ignoring other losses, and blaming one lone woman. Oh, Justice for Lucy Letby, a new appeal we plea, The evidence was flawed, now everyone can see. With new facts on the table, it's time we take a stand, Free Lucy Letby, from this judgement on the land. The bullying consultants' words were taken at their word, But a new expert said a breathing tube's dislodged, how absurd! The air embolism theory, Professor Shu Lee said was wrong, A misunderstanding of science, where did they all go wrong? Dr. Dewi Evans changed his mind about a baby's sad plight, A new theory, a new story, hiding from the light. Oh, Justice for Lucy Letby, a new appeal we plea, The evidence was flawed, now everyone can see. With new facts on the table, it's time we take a stand, Free Lucy Letby, from this judgement on the land. Dr. Ravi's court testimony, contradicted by his mail, He perjured himself, a truly wicked tale. The email said that Lucy was the one who called him in, But they hid it from the jury, making justice wear thin. The insulin tests were dodgy, not made for forensic use, A false positive was a risk, a terrible abuse. Oh, Justice for Lucy Letby, a new appeal we plea, The evidence was flawed, now everyone can see. With new facts on the table, it's time we take a stand, Free Lucy Letby, from this judgement on the land. Her notes were for coping, not a confession to a crime, Just a method from therapy, to get through a tough time. Her defense team was silent, no experts to explain, And others say it was negligence, not murder and not pain. Justice for Lucy Letby! A new day will dawn, And the truth will stand, from dusk until morn.

Stream and Support

This song is available on all major streaming platforms. Please add it to your playlists to keep the algorithm working in our favour.

How You Can Help Today

The campaign to #FreeLucy is gaining momentum, but we cannot stop now. Share this song on Twitter (X), Facebook, and Reddit. Use the lyrics to start conversations.

The truth is coming. Stay tuned to brdinvestigations.co.uk for the latest analysis on the appeal efforts.

#FreeLucy #JusticeForLucyLetby #MiscarriageOfJustice #BeyondReasonableDoubt

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Thumbnail

How the Thirlwall Inquiry Accidentally Exonerated Lucy Letby

THE THIRLWALL PAPERS: A Special Investigative Journal ​ Institutional Failure, Clinical Negligence, and the Question of Miscarriage of Justice at the Countess of Chester Hospital ​EXECUTIVE SUMMARY: The Scapegoat Hypothesis The Thirlwall Inquiry was established to determine how a "serial killer" was allowed to operate unchecked in a British neonatal unit. However, a forensic examination of thousands of pages of transcripts, internal emails, and expert reports reveals a different reality. Instead of confirming the guilt of Lucy Letby, the Inquiry has exposed a hospital in a state of "chronic" operational collapse, flooding with raw sewage, and a specific group of consultants who, unable to explain deaths caused by their own clinical limitations, resorted to speculative theories to shift the blame. This journal combines findings from independent investigative reports and exclusive evidence to present a unified timeline of failure. It posits that Luc...
Thumbnail

Lucy Letby Innocent? New Evidence Suggests Greatest UK Miscarriage of Justice

​It was the trial that gripped the nation. Lucy Letby , a quiet, beige-wearing neonatal nurse from Hereford , was branded the most prolific child serial killer in modern British history. Handed 15 whole-life orders, she was locked away, ostensibly the monster who stalked the wards of the Countess of Chester Hospital . But tonight, a darker, far more disturbing truth is emerging: Lucy Letby may be completely innocent. A bombshell investigation involving world-leading medical experts, leaked documents, and suppressed evidence suggests that the "Angel of Death" narrative was a fiction constructed to cover up a failing hospital's catastrophic incompetence. From consultants who allegedly lied in court to police officers blinded by confirmation bias , the system didn't just fail Lucy Letby—it actively manufactured a killer where there was none. ​Here is the shocking, detailed case for her innocence that the jury never fully heard. ​EXCLUSIVE: The ...
Thumbnail

The Commercialisation of Guilt: Did Judith Moritz and the BBC "Sell" the Lucy Letby Verdict?

In the history of British miscarriages of justice Miscarriage of Justice: A failure of a court or judicial system to attain the ends of justice, typically resulting in the conviction of an innocent person. Notable UK examples include the Birmingham Six and the Guildford Four. , the role of the media has often been to ask the difficult questions that the courts ignored. In the case of R v Letby , however, the media did not just report the prosecution’s case—they monetised it. At the heart of this "guilt industry" stands Judith Moritz, the BBC’s North of England Correspondent. While the public trusted the BBC for impartial reporting, a forensic examination of Moritz's conduct reveals a disturbing alignment of professional duty and private profit. Our investigation suggests that the "unmasking" of Lucy Letby was less a journalistic endeavour and more a commercial product, built on a narrative of monstrosity that was too lucrative to fact-check. ...